“As a result, we do not hesitate to set aside the special condition mentioned in clause 28, which is that the marks obtained in the subsequent examination will be considered final,” the bank said.
The court finds that the petitioners complain that this condition was added to replace the previous policy, whereby the best of two marks obtained by a candidate in a subject had to be kept in the final statement of result.
The court states that the CBSE has not provided any justification for scrapping the previous policy. Last year’s CBSE 12th board exams were canceled due to the pandemic.
In rejecting the petition, the bank said it was necessary to adopt that policy as the difficult situation facing the students in itself justifies the provision that is more favorable to the students.
Initially, CBSE’s counsel said that these students have been assessed according to the improvement survey, and now they cannot make use of the policy.
CEED, UCEED 2022 Admission Card: Exam will be held on January 23, know when and how to download the admission card
“How does this affect you? Give us a justification, why can’t we,” the bank said.
The highest court heard a plea from 11 students, who passed the original results based on CBSE’s 30:30:40 evaluation policy and were later allowed to appear in the improvement exam held in August-September last year. .
The highest court heard the case last month and said the CBSE should consider the problem of students who appeared for Class 12 exams last year to improve their grades but got lower grades because it was higher. .
The court had said that the students who appeared in the reform exam were granted admission based on their original results and that there should be no disruption.